3 Comments

I only just found your substack via mojeek's substack search. The search functions in Substack are not very useful.

I should probably rewrite the following since I found your stack:

You Have No Inalienable Rights On The World Wide Web

only those granted by the United Nations...

https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/you-have-no-inalienable-rights-on

and

Ethical Web Principles, as revised by Yet Another Tommy

should supersede the W3C version...

https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/ethical-web-principles-as-revised

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 7, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thank you for the comment! I will review their papers. Although I believe that consciousness (or freedom) is a requirement for membership in the social contract. My next post will explain this reason further.

Science has been inconclusive on whether nonhuman animals possess consciousness, but the prospects look dim. Reflective action isn’t enough from my perspective. However, we can still have a trustee relationship with nonhuman animals. That being said, I’ll review the works of the philosophers you listed and will adjust my view appropriately.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 7, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Even if they lack consciousness? And if so, where would you draw the line? Would plants and bacteria, or even inanimate objects and hypothetical people, be within our moral universe? Freedom plays an important role in constructivist meta-ethics. And you can still have animal compassion and duties resulting from a trustee relationship.

Expand full comment